|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
KERCHER ENGINEERING, INC. “If a job is worth doing, it is worth doing right!” |
|
Saving our Natural Resources and Money Too! It is a well-known fact that
pavements are very expensive to rebuild.
Unfortunately, asphalt pavements deteriorate relatively quickly when
compared
to other types of infrastructure. This is why the T2 Center
strongly
urges local agencies to implement an aggressive preventative
maintenance
program that focuses on preservation. However, even when
pro-active
maintenance programs are implemented, all pavements will still require
reconstruction at some point in time. Also, structural
improvements
are necessary for pavements that were poorly designed or constructed,
or
are carrying much more traffic today than was initially planned because
of increased growth. Since it is very expensive to structurally
rehabilitate
roads, local agencies MUST consider all possible alternatives to ensure
that the limited tax dollars are invested wisely. One possible
approach
to structurally rehabilitating roadways that can provide a
cost-effective
solution is pavement recycling. This article will discuss two
common
types of asphalt pavement recycling: cold in-place recycling and full
depth
reclamation.
Before Recycling After Recycling These recycling techniques are
used to rehabilitate the surface and
base courses of a structurally failed pavement. In these processes,
existing
pavement materials are uniformly pulverized and blended with a
stabilizing
agent to produce a new, stronger base course that is free of
distresses.
The Asphalt Recycling and Reclaiming Association (ARRA) defines cold
in-place
recycling (CIR) as a partial depth recycling process that rehabilitates
the upper portion of an existing pavement. CIR is only used to
stabilize
hot mix asphalt and aggregate materials. It is not used to
stabilize
the supporting soil material below the pavement. If the supporting soil
requires stabilization, full depth reclamation is typically used. ARRA
defines full depth reclamation as a full depth recycling process where
the entire pavement and a pre-determined portion of the supporting soil
below the pavement (subgrade). More in-depth guidelines for when
to use each process and when to use the different types of stabilizing
agents will be discussed in Part 2. Cold In-Place Recycling Process This process starts with a specialized milling machine where a down cutting head grinds up the old pavement to a controlled depth, usually 3 to 5 inches. The milled material is mixed with a stabilizing agent in a mixing chamber. A computerized device on the milling machine can adjust the amount of emulsified asphalt cement depending upon the depth and type of material being milled. The revitalized material is placed back down on the roadway as a new base course using a standard hot-mix asphalt paver. When the recycled material is initially placed down back down, it is in a fluffy state due to the high air void content. Therefore, a steel-wheeled (minimum 12-ton) roller is used for initial compaction in order to remove the “fluff.” Next, the new base is rolled with a heavy (minimum 25-ton) pneumatic-tired roller that is used to achieve the desired level of compaction necessary for long term performance. When paving with hot-mix
asphalt concrete, the mixture must be compacted
quickly to assure that the proper density has been achieved before it
has
cooled off. With CIR, this is not a problem. Since the
emulsified
asphalt used to stabilize the milled pavement material contains water,
the mixture must be allowed to cure. If the rolling starts too
soon,
the excess moisture will hinder the compaction process because the
voids
are overfilled. Also, prematurely sealing the surface will retard
the initial curing process.
a) Pre-Milling around Utilities b) In-place Recycling c) Paving with Hot-Mix Paver d) Compaction w/ Pneumatic-Tired Roller
Full depth reclamation (FDR)
is a technique used to stabilize the
entire flexible pavement section and a predetermined portion of the
underlying
soil (subgrade). In general, the FDR process is similar to
CIR.
However, there are a few differences that will be discussed briefly.
First,
as stated above, FDR is a full depth reclaiming process used to
stabilize
the entire flexible pavement section and a predetermined portion of the
underlying material. Typically, the depth of milling ranges from 6 and
16 inches. Second, there are many possible stabilizing agents
including
emulsified asphalt, expanded asphalt, portland cement, hydrated lime,
fly
ash and calcium chloride. The type of soil to be stabilized will
dictate which type of stabilizing agent should be used.
Laboratory
testing is necessary to determine which type is most effective for the
specific situation. The third major difference is that a paving machine
is not used. After being mixed with the stabilizing agent, the
reclaimed
material is placed back down on top of the milled surface. A
motor
grader is then used to achieve proper cross-slope and profile.
a) Reclaiming Machine b) Grading with Motor Grader c) Compaction w/ Pneumatic-Tired Roller d) Compacted Stabilized Base Course
Due to the high air void content in the recycled or reclaimed base course, the surface must be sealed prior before freezing temperatures set in. The period of time necessary to ensure adequate curing varies depending upon such factors as the depth of the base course, the type of stabilizing agent and the time of year (environmental factors). Typically, the surface remains uncovered for 7 to 14 days. This does not case a problem for the traveling public since traffic can drive on the completed base course during the curing period. The surface covering can range
from a thin surface treatment such
as a chip seal or micro-surfacing for low volume roads to a thick
overlay
for high volume roads. A common practice is to use a thin overlay
(1 1/2 to 2 inches thick). To ensure that the agency is
constructing
the most cost-effective road possible, it is strongly recommended that
a pavement analysis and design be performed. Advantages of CIR/FDR The benefits of CIR and FDR are similar: 1. Cost Savings Since these techniques utilize existing materials, the major cost is labor and machinery. Therefore, in most situations where these techniques are applicable, the cost savings can range from 20 to 40 percent or more. Some of the factors that will affect the cost of a project are the size of the project, amount of reprofiling, removing or adding materials (if necessary), amount of preparation work and type of stabilizing agent. 2. Environmentally Friendly These processes reuse the existing aggregates and asphalt cement in the roadway, thereby saving our natural resources. Land filling or hauling of new or old materials is normally not required. Also, since these are cold processes, no fuel is burned to heat the new materials. 3. Loss of Curb Reveal Reduced or Eliminated In comparison to the patching and thick overlay option, these techniques can maintain curb reveal by removing some of the existing material in an initial pass of a small milling machine. Subsequent passes of the large milling machine will redistribute the remaining material. This will lower the top of the finished base course and maintain curb reveal. 4. Profile and Cross-slope Restored Bumps and dips can be removed from a road by redistributing milled material. Also, material can either be added or removed. Also, the cross-slope can be modified to improve drainage or other safety problems. 5. Recycling/Reclaiming is Faster These processes can be 30 or 40 percent quicker than typical reconstruction where the existing road can be removed and a new road built. Also, only one lane needs to be closed at a time and can be driven on immediately after compaction, thus reducing traffic problems in the construction zone. 6. Restoration of Existing Pavement Conditions Recycling or reclaiming can be
used to rehabilitate most types of
pavement distress. This includes cracked pavements, fatigue
cracks,
transverse cracks, reflection cracks, potholes and raveling.
Pavements
that have rutting or high asphalt contents present may be restored
through
these processes, but may require additional additives to stabilize the
materials. Specifications As a result of the recycling and reclaiming processes reusing the existing in-place materials, there can be more variability in material properties than when using standard materials that are produced in a plant. In order to minimize an agency’s financial risk in the rare case that there is a premature failure, it is recommended that agencies require the contractor to warranty the base course from defects for a specified period of time (the T2 Center suggests a 5-year warranty period). Someone knowledgeable in these processes must carefully prepare the warranty specification. The specifications should provide basic requirements such as excluding all equipment not capable of properly performing the work, defining acceptable weather conditions, requiring pavement cores and lab testing, providing traffic control, profile and cross-section requirements, and requiring that all material be properly milled – including material around all obstructions. Also, the warranty specifications must carefully spell out what constitutes a failure in the recycled or reclaimed base course and how the failure is to be repaired. However, the specifications must not contain any requirements that could possibly prevent the contractor from providing a base course that is capable of meeting the warranty’s performance requirements. When a warranty specification is used, a proper pavement design is necessary to ensure that the pavement structure is structurally adequate to handle the anticipated traffic loads. For more information about
CIPR or FDR or want Kercher Engineering
to make a field visit to assist in the evaluation of reconstruction
alternatives,
please contact us.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|